Normal view
MARC view
The Selection of authority in legal argument: semantic similarity, pragmatic centrality and analogy
Author: Krawczyk, Katherine ; Marchant, Garry A. ; Robinson, JohnINSEAD Area: Accounting and Control Series: Working Paper ; 93/39/AC Publisher: Fontainebleau : INSEAD, 1993.Language: FrenchDescription: 28 p.Type of document: INSEAD Working Paper Online Access: Click here Abstract: The impact of constraint satisfaction on the selection of authorities in legal reasoning was examined in three experiments. It was hypothesized that subjects would select authorities with semantic similarities over authorities that are structurally consistent with a problem... Consistent with the theory, semantic similarity was the dominant constraint and structural consistency had a negligible impact on selection of an authority| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Digital Library | Available | BC000764 |
Total holds: 0
The impact of constraint satisfaction on the selection of authorities in legal reasoning was examined in three experiments. It was hypothesized that subjects would select authorities with semantic similarities over authorities that are structurally consistent with a problem... Consistent with the theory, semantic similarity was the dominant constraint and structural consistency had a negligible impact on selection of an authority
Digitized
There are no comments for this item.