Normal view MARC view

Governing collaborative activity: interdependence and the impact of coordination and exploration

Author: Aggarwal, Vikas A. ; Siggelkow, Nicolaj ; Singh, HarbirINSEAD Area: Entrepreneurship and Family Enterprise Series: Working Paper ; 2010/51/EFE/ACGRE Publisher: Fontainebleau : INSEAD-Wharton Alliance Center for Global Research and Education (ACGRE) 2010.Language: EnglishDescription: 47 p.Type of document: INSEAD Working Paper Online Access: Click here Abstract: We examine the performance implications of selecting alternate modes of governance in inter-organizational alliance relationships. While managers can choose from a range of modes to govern alliances, prior empirical evidence offers limited guidance on the performance impact of this choice. We use an agent-based simulation of inter-firm decision making to complement empirical studies in this area. Our results point to a complex interplay between interdependencies, governance structures and firms' search capabilities: different patterns of interdependence create varying needs with respect to coordination and exploration, while at the same time different governance modes, coupled with organizational search capabilities, supply varying degrees of these factors; firm performance in an alliance relationship improves when the needs and supplies of coordination and exploration are matched. We find situations in which stronger organizational search capabilities can backfire, leading to lower exploration within the alliance relationship, and hence to lower firm performance. Moreover we show that for higher levels of interdependence, coordination can become more critical for firm performance than exploration: unless it is tied to coordination, exploration can be ineffective in alliance settings.
Tags: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
INSEAD Working Paper Digital Library
PDF Available BC009219
Total holds: 0

We examine the performance implications of selecting alternate modes of governance in inter-organizational alliance relationships. While managers can choose from a range of modes to govern alliances, prior empirical evidence offers limited guidance on the performance impact of this choice. We use an agent-based simulation of inter-firm decision making to complement empirical studies in this area. Our results point to a complex interplay between interdependencies, governance structures and firms' search capabilities: different patterns of interdependence create varying needs with respect to coordination and exploration, while at the same time different governance modes, coupled with organizational search capabilities, supply varying degrees of these factors; firm performance in an alliance relationship improves when the needs and supplies of coordination and exploration are matched. We find situations in which stronger organizational search capabilities can backfire, leading to lower exploration within the alliance relationship, and hence to lower firm performance. Moreover we show that for higher levels of interdependence, coordination can become more critical for firm performance than exploration: unless it is tied to coordination, exploration can be ineffective in alliance settings.

Digitized

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
Koha 18.11 - INSEAD Catalogue
Home | Contact Us | What's Koha?