From imitation to creation: the critical yet uncertain transition for Chinese firms
Author: Xie, Wei ; White, StevenINSEAD Area: Entrepreneurship and Family EnterpriseIn: Journal of Technology Management in China, vol. 1, no. 3, 2006 Language: EnglishDescription: p. 229-242.Type of document: INSEAD ArticleNote: Please ask us for this itemAbstract: Purpose This paper aims to consolidate prior research from policy and management domains to identify stages in Chinas technological learning within the imitation paradigm during 1949-2001, focusing on changes in the governments strategic priorities and policies and the nature, mode and sources of technological learning, then to contrast the firm and institutional features that have emerged under the imitation paradigm with those defining the emerging creation paradigm. The analysis leads to clear implications for both policy and management for the Chinese firms to make this transition and compete in higher value-added global industries. Design/methodology/approach An overview and conceptual paper based on observations and literature review. Findings This paper derives a parsimonious set of four dimensions to demarcate five stages in the evolution of Chinas technological learning: the governments strategic priority, nature of technology, the mode and the source of learning. It identifies six factors acting as significant impediments to Chinese firms transition from imitation to creation. Originality/value In the first place, this paper provides managerial implications which are of great interest to Chinese practicing managers to manage their firms transition from imitation to creation; second, the policy imperatives highlighted by this paper will help Chinese policymakers to design appropriate incentive mechanisms to enable Chinese firms to build up their competitiveness within the creation paradigm and thereby become global competitors. Meanwhile, this paper provides a systematic analysis on the evolution of Chinas technology development. This five stage-based framework will help practicing managers in China understand whether, which and when Chinese firms can make the transition necessary to compete based on the creation of proprietary resources and capabilitiesItem type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Europe Campus | Available | BC009014 |
Ask Qualtrics
Purpose This paper aims to consolidate prior research from policy and management domains to identify stages in Chinas technological learning within the imitation paradigm during 1949-2001, focusing on changes in the governments strategic priorities and policies and the nature, mode and sources of technological learning, then to contrast the firm and institutional features that have emerged under the imitation paradigm with those defining the emerging creation paradigm. The analysis leads to clear implications for both policy and management for the Chinese firms to make this transition and compete in higher value-added global industries.
Design/methodology/approach An overview and conceptual paper based on observations and literature review.
Findings This paper derives a parsimonious set of four dimensions to demarcate five stages in the evolution of Chinas technological learning: the governments strategic priority, nature of technology, the mode and the source of learning. It identifies six factors acting as significant impediments to Chinese firms transition from imitation to creation.
Originality/value In the first place, this paper provides managerial implications which are of great interest to Chinese practicing managers to manage their firms transition from imitation to creation; second, the policy imperatives highlighted by this paper will help Chinese policymakers to design appropriate incentive mechanisms to enable Chinese firms to build up their competitiveness within the creation paradigm and thereby become global competitors. Meanwhile, this paper provides a systematic analysis on the evolution of Chinas technology development. This five stage-based framework will help practicing managers in China understand whether, which and when Chinese firms can make the transition necessary to compete based on the creation of proprietary resources and capabilities
Digitized
There are no comments for this item.