Normal view MARC view

The World is not small for everyone: inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations (RV of 2008/61/OB/ST)

Author: Singh, Jasjit ; Hansen, Morten T. ; Podolny, Joel M.INSEAD Area: Entrepreneurship and Family Enterprise ; Strategy ; Strategy Series: Working Paper ; 2009/49/ST/EFE (revised version of 2008/61/OB/ST) Publisher: Fontainebleau : INSEAD, 2009.Language: EnglishDescription: 47 p.Type of document: INSEAD Working Paper Online Access: Click here Abstract: We explore why some employees may be at a disadvantage in searching for information in large complex organizations. The “small world” argument in social network theory emphasizes that people are on an average only a few connections away from the information they seek. However, we argue that such a network structure may benefit some people more than others. Specifically, some employees may have longer search paths in locating and accessing knowledge in an organization—their world may be large. We theorize that this disadvantage is the result of more than just an inferior network position. Instead, two mechanisms— homophily and periphery status—jointly operate to aggravate the inefficiency of search for knowledge. Employees who belong to the periphery of an organization by virtue of being of minority gender, lower tenure or poor connectedness to experts have limited awareness of who knows what in an organization and a lower ability to seek help from others best suited to guide the search. When they start a search chain, they are likely to engage in homophilous search by contacting colleagues like themselves, thus contacting others who also belong to the periphery. To search effectively, employees on the periphery need to engage in heterophilous search behaviors by crossing social boundaries. We find support for these arguments in a network field experiment consisting of 381 unfolding search chains in a large multinational professional services firm. The framework helps explain employees’ unequal pathways to the knowledge they seek, a poorly understood yet important type of organizational inequity in an information economy. Previous title: World is not small for everyone: pathways of discrimination in searching for information in organizations - Singh, Jasjit;Hansen, Morten T.;Podolny, - 2008 - INSEAD Working Paper Next title: World is not small for everyone: inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations (RV of 2009/49/ST/EFE) - Singh, Jasjit;Hansen, Morten T.;Podolny, - 2010 - INSEAD Working Paper
Tags: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
INSEAD Working Paper Digital Library
PDF Available BC008860
Total holds: 0

We explore why some employees may be at a disadvantage in searching for information in large complex organizations. The “small world” argument in social network theory emphasizes that people are on an average only a few connections away from the information they seek. However, we argue that such a network structure may benefit some people more than others. Specifically, some employees may have longer search paths in locating and accessing knowledge in an organization—their world may be large. We theorize that this disadvantage is the result of more than just an inferior network position. Instead, two mechanisms— homophily and periphery status—jointly operate to aggravate the inefficiency of search for knowledge. Employees who belong to the periphery of an organization by virtue of being of minority gender, lower tenure or poor connectedness to experts have limited awareness of who knows what in an organization and a lower ability to seek help from others best suited to guide the search. When they start a search chain, they are likely to engage in homophilous search by contacting colleagues like themselves, thus contacting others who also belong to the periphery. To search effectively, employees on the periphery need to engage in heterophilous search behaviors by crossing social boundaries. We find support for these arguments in a network field experiment consisting of 381 unfolding search chains in a large multinational professional services firm. The framework helps explain employees’ unequal pathways to the knowledge they seek, a poorly understood yet important type of organizational inequity in an information economy.

Digitized

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
Koha 18.11 - INSEAD Catalogue
Home | Contact Us | What's Koha?