Quantitative goals for monetary policy
Author: Fatás, Antonio ; Mihov, Ilian ; Rose, Andrew K.INSEAD Area: Economics and Political ScienceIn: Journal of Money Credit and Banking, vol. 39, no. 5, August 2007 Language: EnglishDescription: p. 1163-1176.Type of document: INSEAD ArticleNote: Please ask us for this itemAbstract: The authors study empirically the macroeconomic effects of an explicit de jure quantitative goal for monetary policy. Quantitative goals take three forms: exchange rates, money growth rates, and inflation targets. They analyze the effects on inflation of both having a quantitative target, and of hitting a declared target; they also consider effects on output volatility. Their empirical work uses an annual data set covering 42 countries between 1960 and 2000, and takes account of other determinants of inflation (such as fiscal policy, the business cycle, and openness to international trade), and the endogeneity of the monetary policy regime. They find that both having and hitting quantitative targets for monetary policy is systematically and robustly associated with lower inflation. The exact form of the monetary target matters somewhat, but is less important than having a quantitative target. Successfully achieving a quantitative monetary goal is also associated with less volatile output| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Europe Campus | Available | BC008309 |
Ask Qualtrics
The authors study empirically the macroeconomic effects of an explicit de jure quantitative goal for monetary policy. Quantitative goals take three forms: exchange rates, money growth rates, and inflation targets. They analyze the effects on inflation of both having a quantitative target, and of hitting a declared target; they also consider effects on output volatility. Their empirical work uses an annual data set covering 42 countries between 1960 and 2000, and takes account of other determinants of inflation (such as fiscal policy, the business cycle, and openness to international trade), and the endogeneity of the monetary policy regime. They find that both having and hitting quantitative targets for monetary policy is systematically and robustly associated with lower inflation. The exact form of the monetary target matters somewhat, but is less important than having a quantitative target. Successfully achieving a quantitative monetary goal is also associated with less volatile output
Digitized
There are no comments for this item.