Normal view MARC view

Adverse selection in acquisitions of small manufacturing firms: a comparison of private and public targets

Author: Shen, Jung-Chin ; Reuer, Jeffrey J.INSEAD Area: StrategyIn: Small Business Economics, vol. 24, no. 4, May 2005 Language: EnglishDescription: p. 393-407.Type of document: INSEAD ArticleNote: Please ask us for this itemAbstract: This study investigates acquisitions of small manufacturing firms and compares private and public targets. The authors develop the argument that private targets tend to involve higher transaction costs in the presence of adverse selection problems than their public counterparts. Consistent with predictions, the empirical evidence indicates that bidders choose to acquire public rather than private targets when acquiring young firms and when engaging in inter-industry transactions. Acquirers also tend to avoid private targets that have significant intangible assets and have not signaled the value of these resources through other means such as collaborative agreements. The results shed light on the benefits of being public and the decision-making criteria employed by acquiring organizations.
Tags: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
INSEAD Article Europe Campus
Available BC007376
Total holds: 0

Ask Qualtrics

This study investigates acquisitions of small manufacturing firms and compares private and public targets. The authors develop the argument that private targets tend to involve higher transaction costs in the presence of adverse selection problems than their public counterparts. Consistent with predictions, the empirical evidence indicates that bidders choose to acquire public rather than private targets when acquiring young firms and when engaging in inter-industry transactions. Acquirers also tend to avoid private targets that have significant intangible assets and have not signaled the value of these resources through other means such as collaborative agreements. The results shed light on the benefits of being public and the decision-making criteria employed by acquiring organizations.

Digitized

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
Koha 18.11 - INSEAD Catalogue
Home | Contact Us | What's Koha?